by Zac » July 26th, 2014, 4:22 am
by Guges » July 26th, 2014, 12:11 pm
by farseerixirvost » July 26th, 2014, 6:44 pm
Guges wrote:I find their terrain simply awful.
Guges wrote:Seeing one of their final results compared to something like Warsenal, which isn't any more expensive...
by Zac » July 26th, 2014, 6:53 pm
farseerixirvost wrote:Guges wrote:I find their terrain simply awful.
I respectfully disagree.
by Guges » July 26th, 2014, 8:24 pm
Zac wrote:farseerixirvost wrote:Guges wrote:I find their terrain simply awful.
I respectfully disagree.
Please don't feed the troll.
by Plex » July 26th, 2014, 9:23 pm
by Guges » July 26th, 2014, 10:00 pm
by Todd » July 27th, 2014, 12:54 am
by Guges » July 27th, 2014, 12:57 am
by Zac » July 27th, 2014, 1:38 am
Plex wrote:It's interpreted as trolling because you use words like horrible and garbage instead of more reasoned complaints...
by Zac » July 27th, 2014, 1:47 am
Todd wrote:Here's a break down for those under the impression it's cheaper than equivalent MDF products (Warstore prices):.
Todd wrote:Personally, I think they more look like a random objects picked up from a dollar store to be used as containers than anything intentionally designed as such, so their value is a bit dubious.
by Plex » July 27th, 2014, 3:21 am
by csjarrat » July 27th, 2014, 9:52 am
by Guges » July 27th, 2014, 12:54 pm
csjarrat wrote:Have to say I agree with gauges. Bought a couple sets of their stuff and it's not nice to work with. Joints aline badly, it doesn't come out of "sprue" cleanly at all. It's bendy and not particularly durable either given its flexibility.
Still have a few bits to assemble but can't bring myself to finish it off.
It is cheaper than the other stuff in the UK, but Imo, you get what you pay for. At no point has this felt a superior product to warsenal or MAS.
by Todd » July 27th, 2014, 1:26 pm
by Claudius Sol » July 27th, 2014, 4:23 pm
by Zac » July 27th, 2014, 4:36 pm
csjarrat wrote:Have to say I agree with gauges. Bought a couple sets of their stuff and it's not nice to work with. Joints aline badly, it doesn't come out of "sprue" cleanly at all. It's bendy and not particularly durable either given its flexibility.
by Zac » July 27th, 2014, 4:38 pm
Todd wrote:they're not nice enough looking that you couldn't scratch build something comparable or better...
by farseerixirvost » July 27th, 2014, 7:52 pm
by Section9 » July 28th, 2014, 7:31 am
by chromedog » July 28th, 2014, 8:29 am
by Todd » July 28th, 2014, 9:07 am
chromedog wrote:I found it better than MAS stuff (which didn't so much snap together as snap apart - leaving me with broken bits everywhere because NONE of their pieces were cut ALL the way through).
by Spears » July 28th, 2014, 10:53 am
by Guges » July 28th, 2014, 1:09 pm
chromedog wrote:I found it better than MAS stuff (which didn't so much snap together as snap apart - leaving me with broken bits everywhere because NONE of their pieces were cut ALL the way through). By comparison, ALL of the PCG stuff came off the sheets easily and went together easily.
Small dots of superglue and I could get the walls and roof pieces together - then run a small beat down the gap. The buildings will support several TAGs when assembled, and yet the roofs still come off easily enough but don't dislodge at the slightest zephyr.
I'll be getting more of their stuff - and like Section9, I prefer my cities to have a mix of styles. It's only suburban developments that were done by ONE developer (aka the "McSuburb") where every building has the same style.
by Todd » July 28th, 2014, 2:27 pm
by chromedog » August 1st, 2014, 12:00 am
Guges wrote:
The only stuff I found that snaps apart are the MAS walkways which are horrible. They also cause massive LoF problems on the table and after you spend money on them, it's almost as if you didn't buy any terrain. The MAS buildings themselves are pretty amazing and surprisingly sturdy. I still have a whole table of them which have gone to many tournaments, put up with a ton of abuse, and still look pretty good.
Still doesn't compare to my Warsenal objective room which I dropped down a flight of stairs into a door and came out undamaged.
by Guges » August 1st, 2014, 12:12 am
chromedog wrote:Guges wrote:
The only stuff I found that snaps apart are the MAS walkways which are horrible. They also cause massive LoF problems on the table and after you spend money on them, it's almost as if you didn't buy any terrain. The MAS buildings themselves are pretty amazing and surprisingly sturdy. I still have a whole table of them which have gone to many tournaments, put up with a ton of abuse, and still look pretty good.
Still doesn't compare to my Warsenal objective room which I dropped down a flight of stairs into a door and came out undamaged.
They snapped apart GETTING THEM OFF THE framing - because NOTHING was cut through. MY building OR the acrylic holoboards.
The walkways were the easiest ones to assemble and they stayed that way (LoF issues - solved with ad-boards I made myself).
The holoboards got I-beam framing that fit them and the building got tossed into the trash. The stench of burned wood just got to me one day and I binned it (having been IN a fire, I don't find the smell to be a pleasant one at the best of times)
by chromedog » August 1st, 2014, 4:21 am
by Arachas » August 1st, 2014, 5:01 pm
by Guges » August 1st, 2014, 5:21 pm
Arachas wrote:I'm getting a little tired of people calling Guges a troll when he's not doing anything wrong. Yes, he has a strong opinion, but no, he wasn't crossing any lines in my book.
Just saying.