by Melvin McSnatch » July 22nd, 2014, 6:30 pm
by Harlekin » July 22nd, 2014, 6:36 pm
by macfergusson » July 22nd, 2014, 6:56 pm
Harlekin wrote:Seems like Jed is somehow huffy by CB's "forum incident".
I really wish he could get over it and stay with the community even when CB's doesn't behave professional.
by Penemue » July 22nd, 2014, 6:57 pm
macfergusson wrote:Harlekin wrote:Seems like Jed is somehow huffy by CB's "forum incident".
I really wish he could get over it and stay with the community even when CB's doesn't behave professional.
That was my first thought as well. If anyone is going to be upset at how this was handled, it should be dealing with CB, not DS.
But now I'm hearing that both AW and Warsenal talked to DS and weren't happy with the terms of getting involved over here. A little transparency on what those requirements are might be nice. It seems a bit too coincidental that both of them would have a problem with whatever agreement was required.
by macfergusson » July 22nd, 2014, 7:00 pm
Penemue wrote:Disclaimer: I have no idea. Conjecture: perhaps the lack of exclusivity in Data Sphere ruffled a few feathers?
by Harlekin » July 22nd, 2014, 7:05 pm
by Claudius Sol » July 22nd, 2014, 7:42 pm
by macfergusson » July 22nd, 2014, 7:43 pm
Claudius Sol wrote:I don't fault CB for closing their forums.
I fault them for how they handled it.
by ToadChild » July 22nd, 2014, 7:58 pm
by Claudius Sol » July 22nd, 2014, 8:08 pm
by Arachas » July 22nd, 2014, 8:18 pm
by macfergusson » July 22nd, 2014, 8:27 pm
by Claudius Sol » July 22nd, 2014, 8:30 pm
Arachas wrote:Jed is proclaiming everywhere that I've placed very high demands on a partnership. The truth is: I never once called out a number. I flat out asked him: "would you like to know a number, before you judge?" Nope, he had his opinion ready.
Both Jed and Warsenal sent me a curt PM saying: "Open up a subforum will ya?"
And I was like: well, I've reserved those for companies that support DS. Are you interested in doing just that for a small fee? For which you'll get banners on the blog and forum space?
And the apocalypse ensues. Because apparently I was asking outrageous things. No counter offers, no nothing.
More truth: the reason the partnership thing for DS is vague, is because it's not been hammered out yet. Like I said: I haven't even mentioned solid numbers. Never got the chance, with CB's pacing in all this. The companies who are partners right now have contributed to DS by providing us with stuff to review, some stuff for the staff we're looking at... you know, getting skin in the game that is this community.
The deal, from my point of view, remains this: we want to make Data Sphere fun for all parties involved. The community gets a fun and laid back place to post. Companies get a place to share their stuff, both on the blog and forum, and get sales from that. And finally the staff has fun running DS, while occasionally being rewarded for their efforts.
That last thing: rewarding the staff. That's what it's about for me. That, and maybe organising contests, organising events... I don't know yet. Point in case: we need money to do it. That's why I opted for the partnership thing to generate some cash.
If people have a huge problem with that, I'd love to hear the alternatives. Paid memberships like Warseer?
by ToadChild » July 22nd, 2014, 8:41 pm
by macfergusson » July 22nd, 2014, 8:42 pm
ToadChild wrote:It seems to me that CB carries most of the blame on this situation. I'm not meaning to tar/feather any of the DS operators.
by macfergusson » July 22nd, 2014, 8:55 pm
by Harlekin » July 22nd, 2014, 9:03 pm
by FatherKnowsBest » July 22nd, 2014, 9:09 pm
macfergusson wrote:Well obviously CB is watching and aware of the situation now, if they weren't before. Guess we'll just have to see what happens, as they don't want it discussed any further.
by macfergusson » July 22nd, 2014, 9:12 pm
FatherKnowsBest wrote:macfergusson wrote:Well obviously CB is watching and aware of the situation now, if they weren't before. Guess we'll just have to see what happens, as they don't want it discussed any further.
Koni is.
I saw Interruptor on last night as well.....
They done f'ed up.
by Todd » July 22nd, 2014, 9:21 pm
by macfergusson » July 22nd, 2014, 9:28 pm
Todd wrote:To be fair, Arachas knows what's up. He may not have the details of the agreements, but he knows the partners pay CB for privileges. Being that they are now funded by CB (to what extent, we don't know), shouldn't he have checked with CB before going straight to discussing fees? Fees that he admitted would be used to expand, not just maintain DS, and could very well be double charging the partners.
That said, Jed could have waited for some resolution before pulling the contest.
by Antenociti » July 22nd, 2014, 9:43 pm
Arachas wrote:The deal, from my point of view, remains this: we want to make Data Sphere fun for all parties involved. The community gets a fun and laid back place to post. Companies get a place to share their stuff, both on the blog and forum, and get sales from that. And finally the staff has fun running DS, while occasionally being rewarded for their efforts.
by Todd » July 22nd, 2014, 9:45 pm
by Darnok » July 22nd, 2014, 9:46 pm
by Todd » July 22nd, 2014, 9:48 pm
by Arachas » July 22nd, 2014, 9:49 pm
Todd wrote:To be fair, Arachas knows what's up. He may not have the details of the agreements, but he knows the partners pay CB for privileges. Being that they are now funded by CB (to what extent, we don't know), shouldn't he have checked with CB before going straight to discussing fees? Fees that he admitted would be used to expand, not just maintain DS, and could very well be double charging the partners.
That said, Jed could have waited for some resolution before pulling the contest.
Todd wrote:Short sighted as they were, perhaps CB assumed that by funding DS and proclaiming it their official sight, they would naturally honor CB's partnerships?
Naive? Maybe.
by Antenociti » July 22nd, 2014, 9:51 pm
macfergusson wrote:
As a business, DS is providing X service to CB for Y recompense. You don't throw VIP treatment in for free for a third party just because they pitched a fit at you. (Not that Jed shouldn't have been upset, but he should have been upset with CB, not DS.)
by Todd » July 22nd, 2014, 9:55 pm
Antenociti wrote:Arachas wrote:oh, and todd:
Arachas knows nothing about our partnership arrangements with CB, dont credit him with knowledge he doesn't have - lets face it, hes has been claiming this place it the new official Infinity forum for days now - and we all now know how that turned out.
This cancelation is one mans creation and that man is Arachas.
by Antenociti » July 22nd, 2014, 9:57 pm
Darnok wrote:
What I don't understand is the rage pointed at DS. As a company interested in promoting your business you don't just get forum space - you pay for it. That AW wields the "but we don't want to pay twice"-stick is understandable, but actually not the fault of the DS people. CB is to blame for handling the whole affair poorly, not DS.
P.S.: This whole thing starts to look more and more like kindergarten, for most parties involved...