by Harlekin » July 23rd, 2014, 3:52 pm
by Claudius Sol » July 23rd, 2014, 3:58 pm
by NeonPhoenix » July 23rd, 2014, 7:43 pm
by Il_Marsigliese » July 23rd, 2014, 9:34 pm
by Claudius Sol » July 23rd, 2014, 9:37 pm
NeonPhoenix wrote:I have to disagree; the MOV4-2 is certainly not the issue with Bolts; but the confusing stat line that offers nothing in respect to the rest of the NCA army list for it's high cost. As many of said in this forum and others, you don't see bolt's being passed over for fusiliers because of 4-4 Mov vs 4-2. you see them being passed over because they complete the EXACT same role for way, way less; meaning the real punch from NCA is affordable (i.e that aquila and swiss). The point costs for the bolt stat line is frustrating as hell given the quality of the models (and down right confusing; -6 BTS and bioimmunity? really that's a bit overkill, were shock and viral truly crushing PanO players that bad?... doubt it) In fact, unlike sekbans and wildcats (which have pretty decent stat lines to point cost to be honest) which are passed over due the fact there is simply 'better' units options in the lists (everyone knows Kaplans are Ace.. in fact probably tooo Ace... you could argue a pinch OP) and not because the stat lines suck. To improve them, oh i duno, maybe Mov 4-4 sure.. but even just a reduced point cost, maybe a direct template (some sort of E/M? that would be cool); maybe even something a bit more useful then silly Bioimmunity; anything really! as it is; the stat was gimped until N3 no question.
If we are in rumors, what ever happened to the rumors there was a Bolt Engineer? Now! that profile would spark some life into them; an actually alternative to a silly machinist; and give some viable way to finish that classified objective without dumping 15 points.
by NeonPhoenix » July 24th, 2014, 3:24 pm
by Mob of Blondes » September 30th, 2014, 4:37 am
by Lampyridae » September 30th, 2014, 7:37 am
by Lone_Pathfinder » September 30th, 2014, 8:52 am
Lampyridae wrote:Ohhh, very nice. I am glad she gets to sell her own mini. I may not buy it for that price though!
by Errhile » September 30th, 2014, 9:07 am
by Mob of Blondes » September 30th, 2014, 11:12 pm
by Claudius Sol » October 1st, 2014, 8:56 pm
by Mob of Blondes » October 2nd, 2014, 12:17 am
by Lampyridae » October 2nd, 2014, 12:01 pm
by ewok40k » October 5th, 2014, 7:01 am
by Lampyridae » October 6th, 2014, 11:31 am
by Section9 » October 6th, 2014, 7:19 pm
Lampyridae wrote:SVD was always my preferred weapon of choice...
by Errhile » October 6th, 2014, 9:12 pm
by Section9 » October 7th, 2014, 7:58 am
Harlekin wrote:And here is, what Bolts are using:
[ img ]
Errhile wrote:Looks pretty G11 (4,73x33mm caseless) to me, Harlekin. You mean that the Bolts use ammunition that is a 200 years old design?
by Lampyridae » October 7th, 2014, 9:21 am
Section9 wrote:Lampyridae wrote:SVD was always my preferred weapon of choice...
Eh, I prefer the Romanian PSL (and own one). Exact same mechanism as the AK, so fewer parts to lose while field-stripping for cleaning (it comes apart into receiver cover, buffer spring assembly, and bolt+carrier).
But the SVD and PSL are longer than the AK because the ammo is much longer.
From left to right: 7.62x54R (used in Moisin, SVT, SVD, PSL, as well as various machine guns), 7.62x39 (used in AK and SKS), and 7.62x25 (used in Tokarev pistols and PPSh SMG).
The AR10/M110/"Long Action" AR platform has a similar relationship to the AR15/M16. Longer ammunition so longer action. But the M110 or L129 is a marksman rifle, not the standard rifle.
by Icchan » October 7th, 2014, 10:31 am
Section9 wrote:ready to adopt as soon as the US is no longer involved in an active war.
by Scorch » October 7th, 2014, 11:14 am