by ElectricPaladin » July 23rd, 2014, 12:45 am
by Mob of Blondes » July 23rd, 2014, 1:11 am
by Guarda de Assalto » July 23rd, 2014, 1:18 am
by ElectricPaladin » July 23rd, 2014, 1:21 am
by Harlekin » July 23rd, 2014, 1:28 am
by ElectricPaladin » July 23rd, 2014, 1:29 am
Harlekin wrote:We're not talking about huge scale endeavors.. it's individual guys on black ops missions - that's what's represented by a game of Infinity.
So, the army lists don't necessarily say anything about the weaponry units carry in general.
Also, don't forget that any MULTI weapon (including MSR) also can load stun ammo. And that there probably are non-lethal grenades avaliable in the Infinity universe.
Handing a stun Combi Rifle (or a stun pistol as a side arm) to a Moderator wouldn't be so hard, when he is on regular duty, I guess.
But when on an Infinity black ops mission, it probably doesn't make a lot of sense.
And, of course, you'll give the weapons which can one-shot insta-freeze a TAG (ADHL and E/M weaponry) to your elite units and not to the regular grunt, when you can't give one to everybody.
by Micky » July 23rd, 2014, 1:48 am
Harlekin wrote:We're not talking about huge scale endeavors.. it's individual guys on black ops missions - that's what's represented by a game of Infinity.
So, the army lists don't necessarily say anything about the weaponry units carry in general.
Also, don't forget that any MULTI weapon (including MSR) also can load stun ammo. And that there probably are non-lethal grenades avaliable in the Infinity universe.
Handing a stun Combi Rifle (or a stun pistol as a side arm) to a Moderator wouldn't be so hard, when he is on regular duty, I guess.
But when on an Infinity black ops mission, it probably doesn't make a lot of sense.
And, of course, you'll give the weapons which can one-shot insta-freeze a TAG (ADHL and E/M weaponry) to your elite units and not to the regular grunt, when you can't give one to everybody.
by Section9 » July 23rd, 2014, 3:04 am
ElectricPaladin wrote:I should clarify - I'm not bugged that the police units also have lethal weapons, and I'm not bugged that the various elite weirdo units also sometimes get the odd nonlethal weapons. Both of these make sense. What bothers me is that the police units generally never get nonlethal weaponry; that the nonlethal weaponry is only in the hands of the elite military formations.
by Micky » July 23rd, 2014, 4:07 am
by Harlekin » July 23rd, 2014, 11:42 am
Micky wrote:Lets give police units Stun CC weapons at the very least.
by Pierzasty » July 23rd, 2014, 1:14 pm
Micky wrote:Lets give police units Stun CC weapons at the very least.
by Spacefrog » July 23rd, 2014, 5:33 pm
by Barakiel » July 24th, 2014, 6:09 am
by ToadChild » July 24th, 2014, 10:05 pm
by Spacefrog » July 26th, 2014, 7:05 am
Harlekin wrote:Why should they bother carrying around their everyday equipment when they get what they need for their mission?
by Math Mathonwy » July 28th, 2014, 8:25 am
by Section9 » July 28th, 2014, 9:50 pm
Math Mathonwy wrote:The Auxilia are stationed at the "heart of the human sphere" and use Flamethrowers which "is forbidden by the Concilium Convention. Its use will be penalized by international courts."
I don't think that the weaponry choices in Infinity in general make much sense from a fluff point of view.
by Hero of Man » July 29th, 2014, 1:11 am
by chromedog » July 29th, 2014, 7:07 am
Section9 wrote:
And from another point of argument, since when do the Conventions apply to aliens?
by ElectricPaladin » July 29th, 2014, 7:36 am
Hero of Man wrote:Also of note in modern times, it is technically against the Geneva Convention to shoot someone with an Anti-Material Rifle(.50 cal+); these weapons are only to be used against enemy equipment/material. However, a loop hole in this is, a soldier CAN aim at the enemy's gear, such as his Helmet, Radio, Uniform, Weapon, etc. Basically, its all in the wording of the laws.
by Mob of Blondes » July 29th, 2014, 7:52 am
chromedog wrote:This. I've often wondered why the combine players would care. The EI has already shown itself as far removed from care for human morality or laws - it sees genocide as a functional way of getting what it wants.
by Math Mathonwy » July 29th, 2014, 2:33 pm
Mob of Blondes wrote:I can imagine Savoranola talking about this and how all is fake alien, too similar, no brain fucking enough. And if not, I would (and more or less done, but not time to write long rants).
by macbain » July 29th, 2014, 3:01 pm
ElectricPaladin wrote:Hero of Man wrote:Also of note in modern times, it is technically against the Geneva Convention to shoot someone with an Anti-Material Rifle(.50 cal+); these weapons are only to be used against enemy equipment/material. However, a loop hole in this is, a soldier CAN aim at the enemy's gear, such as his Helmet, Radio, Uniform, Weapon, etc. Basically, its all in the wording of the laws.
You're allowed to aim at his... uniform?
I'm in Zurich right now. I may have to take a day trip to Geneva just to yell at it. Goddamn, that's stupid.
by Plex » July 29th, 2014, 6:15 pm
Math Mathonwy wrote:Mob of Blondes wrote:I can imagine Savoranola talking about this and how all is fake alien, too similar, no brain fucking enough. And if not, I would (and more or less done, but not time to write long rants).
Wait, isn't Savoranola the guy who thinks that a penis is the height of controversy?
by ElectricPaladin » July 29th, 2014, 7:00 pm
Plex wrote:Math Mathonwy wrote:Mob of Blondes wrote:I can imagine Savoranola talking about this and how all is fake alien, too similar, no brain fucking enough. And if not, I would (and more or less done, but not time to write long rants).
Wait, isn't Savoranola the guy who thinks that a penis is the height of controversy?
Quite the opposite, I think.
by Math Mathonwy » July 29th, 2014, 9:00 pm
ElectricPaladin wrote:Plex wrote:Math Mathonwy wrote:Wait, isn't Savoranola the guy who thinks that a penis is the height of controversy?
Quite the opposite, I think.
He likes to put wangs on things. If that's controversy, it's in the eye if the beholder.
by ToadChild » July 29th, 2014, 9:05 pm
vorthain wrote:Is lethality as a big a deal with Cube availability in some cases? I mean, if you kill the body in a police action and the Cube is recovered, they could still be tried in court for their crime.